Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Kin folk clique

They say there are no other folk like kinfolk. In this period of a presidential transition, it is difficult for me to see at best and frustrating at worse, that there lies the possibility that the same family will have its last name plastered in the White house again Bush-Clinton, or Clinton-Bush. For some sordid and clandestine reason I feel that these two families are related, that they are maybe forth or fifth cousins, with the same friends, the same political support and same economic interest. Not to mention the disposed megalomania that both branches of this family tree possess.

I don’t know about others, but as far as I can remember, since the elder Bush days, either a Bush or a Clinton has been in the hollow halls of that fat crib on Pennsylvania Avenue. I mean, since 1989 our illustrious leader has had either Bush or Clinton as their Surname. If Hillary wins, well you make the call. That just so happens I am not too comfortable with this as some other may be. Sure folks want Bush out of office, but what is the difference between a Bush and a Clinton – the same political machine politics are in existences, it is just that they pay political dues to different organizations.

I wish I had a stellar record as a political pundit – but I do not. Other wise this Libertarian here would sign up to run thangs up in this camp. But I know personally, I would “a-fear” most of my competition and most of the voting public. Nah, I’m a landowner and got more clout than any singular voting serf.

But I just had to say it. I had to get it off my chest. Aren’t you tired of the same ole same ole? If not try to make this man understand, what is a difference between a Clinton and a Bush, outside of political Affiliation? Add to hat how can you vote for Hillary? Cause folk here just do not get it...

14 comments:

  1. Torrance, thanks for the comment over on the Old Black Church. I like your writing style. I can not see another Bush or Clinton in the White House either. What about Obama?

    ReplyDelete
  2. what is a Libertarian again?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ann - u welcome and thanks for the complement.

    GC - Libertarianism is a political philosophy based on very strong support for individual liberty. Libertarians see protection of private property as essential for liberty and seek to minimize, as much as possible, the power of the state over individuals and their properties. we favor self-responsibility and strongly oppose conscription and the welfare state, because "coercing someone to provide charity and military service is ethically wrong, ultimately counter-productive, or both." Apart from some very basic principles favoring personal freedom and free markets, there is not a canon of "official" libertarian beliefs.

    Example - dont need the government to protec me from myself - some people will call 911, i wont, i will burry them and their car on my property - true soverign citizen 4th amendment style

    ReplyDelete
  4. Take for insance the movie American Gangster that came out..... there we a lot of sublte hints in there as to how things really run. They use media and movies to tell half truths..... those are the truths to be weary of because they suffice your train of thought so as we look no deeper.

    In the movie, Lucas ran it all and everyone thought he was harmless cause they just knew he worked for someone else.... No one single man could've pulled that off, in their vie, especially an African American man. What was the significance? Well, no body watched his movement..... the department payed him very little mid because they were pointing the finger at the obvious offender, or so they thought.

    That right there is an example for us.... but most don't see it.They are caught up in the movie and don't see the message. If Lucas is the example of the powers that be (and that aint our government, but those that fund them... MONEY) he is practically invisable to the naked eye. But the Italian guy he enlisted to be half ass partner, was who they put up as the leader. Lucas still ran shit, just wasn't flashy bout it. He also had all the remaining, hood heads runnin blocks but they all answered to Lucas.

    Take those hood heads and the Italian guy as our president and senate. They are on the front line, or rather, who we see. But they aren't runnin shit.

    Who runs hollywood? hmmmmmm.....

    There is a reason movies are allowed to be put out just like the music and commercials and T.V. programs.

    They certainly aren't gonna put out some shit that is a whole truth, that gets shut down. But a half truth, that will be absorbed by the majority and taken as a truth.

    Sublte mind control is how they rule. As long a humans buy it, they still rule. They cannot afford for everyone to be aware, that would mean the loss of their power.

    You are on point, Raw Dawg, their is more to it than we think!

    One Love,
    Deanna

    ReplyDelete
  5. the thought of extending this inter-familial leadership of our country gives me the heebie-sheebies! although, 43 is not even in the same mental league as Mrs. Clinton, i'm still not comfortable with returning "The Clintons" to the White House... if only we could propel Obama to the top of the polls?!?

    i think the Democrats would rather have more Clinton rather than Obama... just my gut feel. as a result, Mitt Romney or Fred Thompson will probably win this thing in another close presidential showdown!

    ReplyDelete
  6. You're right, T - can't truss it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In the words of Mos Def "they(Clintons and Bushs) passing the presidency around like a party joint"

    ReplyDelete
  8. D - correct as usually great response


    Plez - u think, I hear Obama is 7th cousin to the Bush

    Don - we need to start that book

    Southern Gal - Mos Def is the truth, and so is hydroponic I HEAR

    ReplyDelete
  9. as my lil sis says, "it's the same shit; different toilet"

    basically, we're stuck with the same old rhetoric; just said/presented differently. what a scary place we live in.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If Hillary wins, can we expect another Bush to run afterwards? Aren't we sick of these people yet? Huckabee is just another Bush, only more populist -- I suspect, unlike Edwards, he actually does hate the rich. I've noticed that those who are against the rich pass laws that prevent people from even becoming rich. I bet if we could vote "none of the above," that it would win.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Man, I just got off the phone with my mother (she was an activist and I am her baby activist so we do stuff like that instead of talking about family stuff) and we were just going back and forth about the Pros and Cons of the Obama/Hillary run for President. I tell you, this is truly a country based in Political Royalty.

    I invite you to come check out my views on the subject, I think you'll find them interesting.

    http://thepoetshazza.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete

PURCHASE MY BOOKS AT BBOTW.COM