In his book THE CASE FOR DEMOCRACY, Natan Sharansky,
a former Soviet political prisoner released from prison by Mikhail Gorbachev in
1986 wrote “A society is free if people have a right to express their views
without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or physical harm.” He also added, “A society that does not
protect dissent will inevitably be based on fear.” Although it is clear his
perspective is based on his personal experience growing up as a Jew in the
former Soviet Union, it strikes me as if he is writing about America today.
Since the start of this century, the focus of the US
federal government, in all aspects has been directed toward encouraging uniformity
and conformity, in view, belief and idea of all its citizens, specifically by
playing on the emotional projection of being either “with or against us.” This mentality gained its maximum utility of
expected outcomes when the U.S. began its famed “war against terror.” Terror being
singularly contrived from emotion representing in its basic understand an
extreme fear. I say this because no two individuals, let alone all humans for
that matter are the same. Some may have
an extreme fear or water, others may not; some may have an extreme fear of
snakes and insects, others may not. However, this is the desire of the powers
that function in the highest capacity of both political and corporate
leadership in America.
Now there are many that would argue against my thesis,
however, they would most be those individuals that consider themselves
progressive and would in the same sentence disavow the historical truth that their
views are rooted in socialism, specifically cultural Marxism. They will also in
the same sentence admit that no one has the same identical experiences,
backgrounds, views, preferences and/or intelligence, yet cannot accept that
others may not agree with them based on the aforementioned. The point being,
the notion of a complete and uniform homogenous society defined by a severe
ideological commitment to uniform collectivist values, ideas, views and beliefs
is as realistic as the Easter bunny.
The reality of individual differences I speak of is
a social pariah in today’s America. Dissent, even based on fact or personal view
is currently equated to being the enemy. And there are many examples to this. Let’s
us take global warming for example, which has been conveniently changed to
climate change. Now from my experiences and readings, I understand that even
before the Wurm glaciations (before man existed), there has always been
climate change on the Earth – this is a scientific fact. However, with this
said, if I don’t accept it is due to man, or that no single factor has ever
been the sole cause of any phenomena, I am ridiculed by the majority; and
instead of being disproven by discourse and data, called names and ridiculed.
For me, not relying on the words of a politician,
specifically that carbon is a pollutant and man is the SINGLE cause of these
changes, is my death nail. Why because in my argument I include the sun and its
recent periods of strong coronal mass ejections and solar radiation storms,
stronger solar flares and increased UV radiation of the past few decades, in
formulating my perspective. I also include the observation that these events we
experience Terrestrially cannot be caused by man or “carbon pollutants” alone
if it is well documented they are occurring on Jupiter, Saturn, Pluto (Pluto is undergoing global warming, as evidenced by a
three-fold increase in the planet’s atmospheric pressure during the past decade
plus), Mars, Triton (Neptune’s largest moon),
and other celestial bodies which don’t have SUVs or humans driving them.
And
don’t ask them to compare the Carbon dioxide rates of Venus to Earth in terms
of Carbon dioxide density, then they only curse more for you having dissenting
and differing ideas of your own. Especially if you ask, if Saturn, Mars, Jupiter, Pluto and Triton all "appear" to be
warming, how can we be sure that Global Warming is man-made let alone a
function of carbon dioxide emissions? The only response one in my experience would get are vehement attacks on charcter but not facts, simply because I trust physicist and MIT over Al Gore and Barack Obama.
Like the war on terror, this entire
man-made carbon is a pollutant (when carbon is organic and not inorganic) is fatuous
and typical of a fear based society just like the war on terror. This is also
observed even with regards to basic beliefs. If you do not agree with gay
marriage or homosexuality one is called a homophobe simply for not believing in
the practice. Personally it is like
saying because I hate the Dallas Cowboys (which I do); I am a footballphobe – complete
and utter idiotic nonsense. The way I see, one can believe what they want, and I
can listen or accept or disagree, but just because we have different views don’t
make me think you are stupid or less than those who agree with me.
See America, we are not as free as we
think in this constitutional republic. Whether folk can see it or not, this
nation is teetering on the brink of tyranny. Yep, I said it. If one is chastised
for not accepting what others say you should accept, or believe what the middle
of the normal distribution say you should, and you are punished for such, that
my friend is tyranny of the fascist order. Don’t take my word, recently a
former vet was arrested and called mentally ill for voicing his views against the government on Facebook,
and now, The Obama Administration via Eric Holder will be implementing a
program designed to punish and imprison folk for thought that they see and deemas disagreeable. And this isn’t from
Orwell’s 1984.
We have these behaviors now because most
folk do not think for self and have instead been indoctrinated into what to
believe. As such, when they do think, it is merely an amalgamation of
generalizations and stereotypes which are not grounded in research or fact, but
rather due to their learned irrational natures and simple mindless.
Consequently, when their beliefs are questioned and/or challenged, if they
cannot ignore you, they take it as a personal attack to defend the status quo,
they call you intolerant and prejudice just because they don’t understand
specific distinctions or nuance or from a personal point of view, they just
hate to be wrong, because that in their minds such makes them feel as if they
are not important.
This is what happens in a fear society,
when you do not agree you are the bad person - the enemy. All that matters,
even if they know they are being controlled and their thoughts are not their own,
is that those they acknowledge the power that makes them feel important,
correct and even worse – knowledgeable.
America from this perspective is moving
away from a free society because dissent and differing views and beliefs are no
longer tolerated or accepted. And the folk who accept this would never dare to
accept or think that their government, like the intellectuals under Stalin, or
the scientific class of Iran in the early 1980s, would ever think of doing
such. But that is how it is done, it isn’t call TV programming by accident, nor
is by chance that major news outlets glorify the masses on behalf of the
corporate and political class.
So if you did not know, now you should,
but I suspect most will ignore the wisdom in this tractate and cut on their idiot
box and talk about shit they don’t know what the fuck they talking about as if
they really know. And I have no problem with saying what I believe, for as it
was once written, you make enough laws we all can be criminals and this my friend,
is a risk I can live with as a free thinker.

