Syria: Another Progressive Proxy War on Behalf Of US for Israel to Attack Iran

I want to write a few paragraphs to present my understanding of the current Syrian Quagmire. But In order to do this, it requires I be in contradiction to the Obama’s Administration position on the nation, a brief comprehension of history and above all, objective.

 The way I have evaluated the US interest in Syria, it would purport that Israel desires toward Iran and nothing else is the focal point of this US and NATO instigation against Assad. First it is clearly evident that Palestinian’s know that Israel will not grant them a state unless it is forced to do so. This position has shown itself in overt terms via the election to the Egyptian presidency of Muhammad Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood. Second, the economy more so than the protection of civilians or the desire for democratic transition is more essential for US economic interest than political interest; how else are we to keep our money making defense industries alive unless we are in incessant battle with terrorism, regardless if it exist or not?

Syria for the record as we know it today did not exist until a treaty ending in August 1920 after World War I at Sevres, France, between the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) and the Allies occurred. Now It is important to recall that this treaty destroyed the Ottoman Empire and Turkish sovereignty, but resulted in the sovereignty of Mesopotamia (Iraq), Palestine and Jordan. In the process, Palestine and Jordan were basically given to the British and Syria (including Lebanon), were given to the French. Turkey retained Anatolia but was to grant all of the aforementioned was finalized under the Treaty of Lausanne which was signed on 24th of July 1923.

However, since then the region has continued to show incessant signs of instability, namely because of the US interest in maintaining the desires of Israel over the self determination of other nations. Now, the Obama administration has inherited this shaky instability and obviously feel that the progressive approach as presented via example before him by Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt, and even Truman is the best way to go for the United States, even if that means developing proxy wars on the behalf of the interest of other nations (Israel) over the interest of the US.

In simple terms the US and NATO’s are employing what they did in Libya and using it as a model to destabilize Syria, by hook or crook if needed. It may be hard for many to comprehend this if they lack a sufficient knowledge of the policies of Wilson and Truman, or worse, if they only believe and accept without query what is being fed to them by US mainstream media. The obvious outcome based on actions by all parties involved to date, will be a bombing attack on Iran’s nuclear and missile facilities – contingent upon the ousting of the current Syrian leadership - thus, using the resulting chaos of a failing Syrian state as a disguise an attack on Iran. Preferably, given the history of Turkey after World War I, the US will use them to serve as a cover front for deposing Assad and their subsequent attack on Iran – all which singularly benefit Israel.

Unbeknown to most, weapons from Saudi King Abdullah and Israel and possibly feed via the CIA are being sent to the rebels as I write. And I would not be surprised if the Saudi are not prepared with tanks and Special Forces to enter Jordan both to protect Jordan's King Abdullah against potential reprisals from Syria, Iran and even Iraq (yes Iraq) and attack Syria.

Obama has worked this out with Israel, knowing that Iran, Syria and Iraq are mainly Shiite and the Saudi’s mostly Sunni. Thus resulting in a Western-Arab-Turkish alliance military operation against Syria and eventually Iran. The problem is that Israel is still the target of most Arab states and that our present support for Islamist terrorists in Syria may proffer more risk than the present administration anticipates. We saw this before with Osama Bin Laden, who was cared for in the later stages of his kidney illness by the CIA’s own doctors for his support in waging war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan (who eventually turned on the US) and Anwar al-Awlaki, also a CIA work horse who was even once invited to the Pentagon for dinner.

Although US media has not informed the public of such, the reality is just as in Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq; the Syrian people do not want any Western intervention in their country.

Under the guise of “humanitarian,” the Obama administration has begun to wage an undeclared war on Iran in concert with Israel. This although the record indicates that talks between Iran and the UN Security saw the United States refuse to compromise when a deal was available whereby Iran would give up enriching uranium to 20% in exchange for an easing of sanctions and recognition of its right under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to produce nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes. Instead, we accepted Israel’s demand that Iran be forced, by means of further sanctions and military threats, to suspend all enrichment. Strange when Israel and the US have nuclear weapons.

I cannot place all of this at the feat of Obama, albeit his neocolonial aggressiveness has resulted in the deposition of more leaders of sovereign states than any Presidents prior. Let’s face it, after all the uproar with Libya, we hear nothing about the nation now. Although we know that the ones we called “freedom fighters” have turned out to be sectarian terrorists now carrying out a brutal campaign of nationwide torture, illegal imprisonments, and genocide across the nation. Once all in Libya had free electricity – now they do not, and I will not mention how they are treating Black Africans. Entire towns have been wiped out with from ethnic and religious cleansing leaving the rest leaving the country for their lives. And I will not mention Somalia and several other African nations.

Yes this is our Syrian foreign policy in a nutshell. It’s not our policy and it isn’t about Syria. It’s Israel’s policy and it’s about Iran. In fact, according to US Army General Wesley Clark, since the early 1990′s, was aware of a plan to overthrow the “old client regimes” of the Soviet Union. In the post-9/11 era, the same efforts were resurfaced to invade and overthrow the governments of seven specific nations, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya Somalia, Sudan, and Iran as told by General Clark himself during a presentation he made at the Commonwealth Club of California, October 3, 2007.